I don’t know if any of you witnessed the dust up over at
Cupid’s Literary Connection on Friday, but it’s had me thinking about contests and
writers all weekend long.
Some background: Cupid got trolled. She responded in a very professional
manner. Unfortunately, the attacks were pretty personal, so she had to delete
the most offensive comment. It’s really too bad, I sort of like giving people
enough rope to hang themselves, but I can see where Cupid was coming from. Good
on her for responding with the calm of a steely-eyed missile man (that’s a nerdy
NASA compliment).
More background: It was a guest post by
Dahlia about who
should enter contests and why. Zang! She was spot on, and I have to sheepishly
admit that I have violated her “If your novel isn’t ready, don’t submit it to a
contest. You are just wasting our time.” (Hangs head in shame and considers
littering up inboxes with apologies and thank you notes).
What was controversial about Dahlia’s statements was
something I thought everyone knew: If your manuscript has been making the
contest rounds, consider not entering every single contest. She rightly stated
that many, many contests have all the same agent judges. They like contests;
that’s how they play. Simple as that. Which means that if you get your stuff in
front of the same agent more than once, they can see how your submission is (or
is *not* changing), but pretty much, if they’ve seen it twice and passed both
times, they really aren’t interested. Dahlia suggested that if you’d already
put your manuscript out that you be considerate and not stick it out there
again and again and again. She suggested that such a write might want to give
someone else a chance to get their work in front of agents.
I totally understand why some people were upset about that
idea. But she’s pretty much spot on.
So why would writers keep throwing out their trodden down
manuscripts over and over so much that she would suggest that some people with
tired manuscripts leave off for a while? As writers, we sometimes start to feel
desperate about our work. “Will I ever get published?” “Why won’t an agent just
read my manuscript?” “Why is this taking so long?” “Holy Krakatoa, am I going
to have to trunk another novel and start this business over from scratch?????” “Please
dear god of literary awesomeness, let THIS novel be the one. Pretty please.”
It’s easy for these thoughts to become the blackened vitriol
of the disenfranchised. Perhaps you’ve heard a few:
“Agents never sign clients from the slush.”
“Agents never read query letters unless they already know
you.”
“Agents are only interested in commercial drivel.”
“Agents are three horned devils who only wear Prada and
Jimmy Choos.”
Okay, maybe that last one is on to something, but I can
honestly say that the whole idea of the first three statements are utterly
negated by a shred of logic.
Statement one “Agents never sign clients from the slush.”
This one is so laughable, I don’t even think it’s worth
mentioning that the number of clients signed by a contest versus those who get
signed from the slush? It’s not even a contest (see what I did there), it’s
something ridiculous like 95% of clients signed come from the slush.
Statement two “Agents never read query letters unless they
already know you.”
Then what is the point of being open to queries? I mean
really, if they’re so busy that they only read queries from people they know,
they have a mode for that. It’s called the “I’m closed to queries except for by
referral.” Yeah, I know, it’s crazy the information you can find out about an
agent by doing some research!
Statement three “Agents are only interested in commercial
drivel.”
Sigh, internet, you make me so sad some days. Yes, agents
want something commercial, and I understand if there are really popular books
that have both massive fan followings and massive detractors (cough
coughtwilightcough cough), but to insinuate that all commercial successes are
drivel shows an incredible closed mindedness that should be educated by
watching Phineas and Ferb Across the Second Dimension. No really, it’s a great
movie, a commercial success, and aimed at children so the content isn’t too
mentally challenging.
It’s also brilliant in a super nerdy way.
And there are lots of nerds in the world.
There are also a ton of screaming teenage girls in the
world. That doesn’t mean that every boy band is untalented and incapable of
singing a real song. It just doesn’t hurt their music that they’re cute and
overproduced. Same with books.
My point is just because it’s commercial doesn’t mean it
lacks emotional value.
As writers, when we fall into those desperate places, and
those disenfranchised thoughts start to turn our heads inside out, it’s time to
take a break. See the world not from your own corner, but take a look around
you. I get that life isn’t the basket of roses Annie promised, but that doesn’t
make it a pit of depravity either. Writing is very insular, and sometimes we need
a moment or two away from the publishing scene to really create something that
will knock the judges off their podiums.
Take a break. Recharge. Write what you love. And for the love
of chocolate, don’t take your frustrations out on anyone, especially not the
contest providers. Now, go watch
The Kid President if you’re having a hard
time, and get back to writing (it’s the only part that matters until you sign
or decide to self publish).
Now, I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’m going to go
offer my services to some of these bloggers who are always hosting the contests
I LOVE entering. What they do is above and beyond, and I’m in awe of their
paying back (or forward or sideways).
p.s. I didn't talk about people charging for contests, but that's because I don't have a deep meaningful answer for that. If you feel entering a contest is worth paying the paltry fee, then do it. If you don't, then don't enter, simple as that.